NEW DELHI – Businessman Vijay Mallya and Kingfisher Airlines Ltd on Wednesday submitted in a sealed cover a proposal for repayment of Rs 4000 crore to the consortium of banks, led by the State Bank of India, by September this year.
Along with Mallya and Kingfisher, the proposal was also submitted by United Breweries (Holdings) Ltd and Kingfisher Finvest (India) Ltd.
Mallya offered to pay Rs 2,000 crore upfront and remaining Rs 2,000 crore by September 30, 2016.
Mallya’s offer was made in the Supreme Court by his counsel C S Vaidyanathan.
But his counsel remained silent on the question of whether Mallya intended to return to India from London or not.
The SC allowed the consortium of banks to respond within a week’s time to Mallya’s proposal and posted the matter for hearing on April 7.
During the hearing today, Mallya also accused media of running campaign against him while assuring to payback loans. On this, the SC bench observed that media is doing its job in public interest.
On March 9, the government had informed the apex court that Mallya, who is facing legal proceedings for allegedly defaulting loans of over Rs 9,000 crores from various banks, has left the country a few days back.
The bench had then issued notice to Mallya and sought his response within two weeks on pleas filed by the consortium of banks seeking direction for freezing his passport and his presence before the apex court.
The bench had allowed the plea of attorney general that the notice to him can be served through his official Rajya Sabha email ID, the Indian high commission at London, through counsel representing him before various high courts, Debt Recovery Tribunal and also through his company.
The AG had said that an amount of over Rs 9,000 crore was due to various banks and, on one pretext or the other, Mallya avoided to settle them.
Attorney general Mukul Rohatgi had said there was a need for a garnishee order (to attach money or property), as also for disclosure on behalf of Mallya.
Rohatgi had said the banks were seeking an order that Mallya should appear in person before this court and sought a direction for freezing his passport.
The AG had said that Mallya had assets abroad which are far excessive to loans secured by him here.
When the bench had asked how banks granted loan to Mallya under such circumstances, the AG had said loans were granted keeping in mind that Kingfisher Airlines had a fleet of aircraft as well as brand value. Loans were given also as the aircraft were attached to third parties.
The consortium of banks, in their appeal, assailed the March 4 order of Karnataka high court refusing an ‘ex-parte ad interim’ order against Mallya, England-based Diageo Plc and United Spirits Limited.
The banks said the high court should have passed interim order securing their financial interests, without hearing Mallya and others including debtor firm Kingfisher Airlines.
Prior to moving the high court, the banks had filed four pleas in Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) at Bengaluru seeking reliefs like freezing of Mallya’s passport, arrest warrant against him and issuance of a “garnishee order against Diageo Plc and United Spirits Ltd from disbursing USD 75 million”.
The banks had moved the DRT in the backdrop of Mallya’s recent resignation from the chairmanship of United Spirits.
Diageo Plc, the current owner of the liquor company, has agreed to pay USD 75 million (approx. Rs 515 crore) to Mallya as severance package.
