Inderjit Singh Reyat’s lawyer Ian Donaldson had argued that his client’s perjury conviction should be overturned because of an error by the trial judge in his instructions to the jury. Donaldson wants to establish which of the 19 alleged lies that the jury all agreed on since they were allowed to believe any one of them to convict Reyat as instructed by the trial judge. But the three judges disagreed.
By R. Paul Dhillon
SURREY – The B.C. Court of Appeal has upheld a perjury conviction for Inderjit Singh Reyat, who received Canada’s longest perjury sentence.
Reyat, considered a “scapegoat” for RCMP’s incompetence by many familiar with the Air India case, was forced to be a Crown witness at the trial of Ripudaman Singh Malik and Ajaib Singh Bagri, who were acquitted in the biggest case of aviation terrorism before the 9-11 attacks in the U.S.
But while the RCMP and Crown wanted him to sing like a canary – Reyat said what he had been saying all along that he does not know who actually made the bombs and who put the bombs on the plane and that he did not assembled the parts to be made into a bomb for the Air India plane but that in fact he was doing so for the Sikh militant cause in Punjab
The culprits behind the twin bombings – which were designed to happen while the two Air India planes were on the tarmac rather than in the air -are believed to a mix of Indian government agents and Sikh militants in a conspiracy designed to discredit the Sikh community.
Reyat’s lawyer, Ian Donaldson, told the Appeal Court that the perjury verdict was unfair because the jury may not have been unanimous. He argued the jury should have been directed to agree on at least one false statement. The Appeal Court judges disagreed.
Until Reyat’s conviction, the longest perjury sentence ever handed down in Canada was six years for a case in Alberta.
Reyat is the only man found guilty in connection to the An Air India bombing. And even though in a statement of fact both the Crown and the Defence agreed that Reyat only gathered the parts that could be made into a bomb but that he never actually assembled a bomb and don’t know who did – he was given one of the longest sentences for lying while testifying in the Air India trial.
The perjury or lies that Reyat is accused to refers to him refusing to divulge the information that RCMP wanted him to do about who was involved in the conspiracy to bomb the plane but Reyat has said all along that he doesn’t know anything about the conspiracy and who was allegedly involved.
Reyat was found guilty because the Crown said he did know who was involved despite Reyat’s pleadings that he did not.
Since the Air India judge had already written in his verdict that Reyat lied on the stand so the jury simply went with that, acknowledging that since the Judge said Reyat was lying then he must be lying and found him guilty. He was then given a lengthy nine year sentence.
Reyat’s lawyer wants to establish which of the 19 alleged lies that the jury all agreed on since they were allowed to believe any one of them to convict Reyat as instructed by the trial judge.
Reyat is also appealing that sentence, claiming that it was harsh and unfit.
Reyat, who has served more time than he was actually legally given sentences for, has been made a scapegoat for RCMP-CSIS’s incompetent police work. Reyat is also being punished for refusing to name names as the RCMP has tried to get him to do, bribing him with witness protection and money.
But Reyat has refused to budge and continues to maintain that he did not know who was actually involved in the conspiracy and doesn’t have anything to do with the people who actually placed bombs on the planes.
Reyat has said and he continues to say that he never intended to build a bomb or to bomb any planes and that at the height of the abuses by the State of India against Sikhs – he was asked and willingly helped in any way that he could for the Sikh militant cause. But that he never agreed to any terrorist plots or killing innocents – at least that’s what he specifically said in an interview more than a decade ago.
In the only interview he has given to any Canadian media – Reyat told the LINK editor R. Paul Dhillon many years ago that he did not have anything to do with the Air India bombing and he does not know who did.
Reyat was a Crown witness at the trial of Ripudaman Singh Malik and Ajaib Singh Bagri, who were acquitted in the Air India case.
Reyat’s testimony was part of a deal that saw him plead guilty to manslaughter in the deaths of 329 people aboard Air India Flight 182 on June 23, 1985.
Reyat has been in prison since his arrest and extradition from England in 1989.
